Andrew Revkin sounds off on carbon offsets

In aldactone information some cases, factors or conditions could prevent your doctor from cheapest gel side effects dose prescribing Yaz due to the risk of harm. Using this flagyl sale type of service may help lower the drug's cost and buy generic metronidazole gel allow you to receive your medication without leaving home. Despite cheap metronidazole gel these challenges, people with IBS may be able to minimize cheap vibramycin travel's impact on their IBS symptoms. People should speak with price of celebrex a doctor about any medications or treatments that may be get azor necessary to manage general heart health following a chronic pericarditis buy estrace online diagnosis. To find out how the costs of these brand-name order accutane drugs compare with the cost of nifedipine, talk with your erythromycin for sale doctor, pharmacist, or insurance provider. Unlike myofascial pain syndrome, which cheap nexium in usa causes localized muscle pain, fibromyalgia causes widespread, or systemic, pain. generic nasonex online An allergist can carry out tests to find out what generic nexium is causing a person's symptoms and help them create a treatment.

Are they useful or just the 21st century equivalent of indulgences?

But is the carbon-neutral movement just a gimmick?

On this, environmentalists aren’t neutral, and they don’t agree. Some believe it helps build support, but others argue that these purchases don’t accomplish anything meaningful — other than giving someone a slightly better feeling (or greener reputation) after buying a 6,000-square-foot house or passing the million-mile mark in a frequent-flier program. In fact, to many environmentalists, the carbon-neutral campaign is a sign of the times — easy on the sacrifice and big on the consumerism.

As long as the use of fossil fuels keeps climbing — which is happening relentlessly around the world — the emission of greenhouse gases will keep rising. The average American, by several estimates, generates more than 20 tons of carbon dioxide or related gases a year; the average resident of the planet about 4.5 tons.

At this rate, environmentalists say, buying someone else’s squelched emissions is all but insignificant.

“The worst of the carbon-offset programs resemble the Catholic Church’s sale of indulgences back before the Reformation,” said Denis Hayes, the president of the Bullitt Foundation, an environmental grant-making group. “Instead of reducing their carbon footprints, people take private jets and stretch limos, and then think they can buy an indulgence to forgive their sins.”

[NYTimes]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>